You Can't Spell 'Underground Violations' without OSU

Upon Further Review: Punish Him!!!

Here's another thing that I can't seem to come to terms with.  In a world where professional athletes are lambasted for making more than one mistake on-and-off the field, it appears that Jim Tressel has reached unchartered waters.  Beyond his impressive overall win-loss record of 106-22 in 10 years at Ohio State and a National Championship in 2002, Tressel has been allowed to bring in players with conduct issues that puts a blemish on the program, and get away with little or no punishment.

However, the NCAA has finally cracked down on this sweatervest wearing prick with a two-game suspension to begin next year's ball games and was fined a hefty sum of $250K.  About damn time. Looking into Tressel's past, you'd think that repeat offenders would have a greater degree of punishment for the lack of control of his player's off-the-field conduct.  Let's run down the list of player goofs under Coach T:

2010: Terrelle Pryor and four others suspended 5-games in 2011 for selling or bartaring items and jerseys for tattoos which is a violation of NCAA rules.

2004: Troy Smith suspended for the season ending bowl game and the first two games of the 2005 season for accepting benefits from boosters, before going on to win the Heisman Trophy in 2006.

2002: Maurice Clarett was suspended after the National Championship game for also accepting benefits from the boosters.

Prior to that, when Tressel was at Youngstown State, one of his QBs was punished for accepting cars and other benefits from boosters.

Another interesting stat I found on ESPN's article is that since 2000, Ohio State has reported 375 violations of NCAA conduct, the most out of any of the FBS schools.  The thing that irks me about this particular violation is that Tressel had gathered information about the conduct of his players last April.  This guy said that he was going to take care of the issue with his players and he never did.  Now I do think that $250K is a lot of money, but not really considering this guy makes a few million each and every year.  And only two-games, when the guy had knowledge 5 months before the college football season even began? I just don't understand the justice system for a guy who had this knowledge long before anything had been done about it.

Normal people that withhold information about a crime without telling proper law enforcement are considered heretics and are given prison sentences.  How does this rule not apply in parallel with punishment for college athletics.  Tressel should be suspended just as long as Pryor and the other players, if not longer, and should have to pay upwards of $500K dollars because he obviously, judging by his lack of character in the past, hasn't learned his lesson.

-Pat

College Football Blotter Report: The Troy Smith Blueprint

The year is 2006.  Going into the college football season the Heisman favorite is an Oklahoma Sooner (Adrian Peterson).  One of the other favorites is the Senior quarterback for the Florida Gators (Chris Leak).  The Sooner gets injured early in the year and is knocked out of the race.  The Senior Gator QB never quite lives up to expectations.  As a result, the Heisman Trophy goes to the efficient, but not spectacular, QB of the undefeated Ohio State Buckeyes, Troy Smith.

Flash forward to 2009.  Going into the college football season the Heisman favorite is an Oklahoma Sooner (Sam Bradford).  One of the other favorites is the Senior quarterback for the Florida Gators (Tim Tebow).  The Sooner gets injured early in the year and is knocked out of the race.  The Senior Gator QB has not quite lived up to expectations.  As a result, by the end of the year the Heisman Trophy could wind up going to this year's version of Troy Smith 2006: the efficient, but not spectacular, QB of the undefeated Alabama Crimson Tide, Greg McElroy.

In 2006 Smith benefited from a college football landscape where none of the preseason favorites for the Heisman played up to their hype, and his two biggest competitors at the end of the season (Darren McFadden and Brady Quinn) wound up playing for teams with multiple losses.  Because of the field dropping back, Smith was able to win the Heisman with a season that looks a bit odd in hindsight for a Heisman winner:

- One 300 yard game

- Six games with under 200 yards passing

- 2500 passing yards

- Less than 3000 total yards

So how did Smith win it?  Other than leading OSU to an unblemished record, only one individual stat stood out for Smith; his sterling touchdown to interception ratio, 30/5.  Other than that, Smith was downright pedestrian.  He was 38th in the nation in passing yards, and was only only fourth in his own league (behind the likes of Curtis Painter, Brian Cupito, and Drew Tate).

Smith's victory in 2006 is a blueprint for how Heisman voters react to a year without a clear cut winner; they go safe.  Starting QB for the #1 team in the country is about as safe as it gets.  The same thing happens in other sports as well; no clear cut MVP in baseball?  High RBI guy on the best team in the league.  No clear cut Cy Young winner?  Pitcher with the most wins for a playoff team.  No clear cut NFL MVP?  Starting QB for the team with the best record.  And on and on it goes.

As this year has unfolded, two things are clear in the Heisman race; the presumptive favorites are not playing as expected (Bradford, Tebow, McCoy), and nobody is stepping up to fill their place.  Because of this, McElroy is in prime position to follow the Troy Smith blueprint and steal the Heisman.

Think about it; McElroy is averaging roughly 220 yards and two TDs a game, while having only thrown one INT through five games.  Stretching that production out over the entire season (including an SEC championship game), McElroy's stats would wind up looking a whole lot like Smith's did in 2006; 2800 total yards, 27 total TDs, and 3 INTs.  If the other contenders continue to falter (Bradford, Jacory Harris, Jahvid Best, Max Hall, and Case Keenum have all already been bounced), McElroy could find himself with the Heisman Trophy come December.

Rank Me Please

If the teams below are not ranked come tomorrow, it is about time to call your local AP voter and start lodging complaints:

1. Auburn 5-0:  The Mighty Malzahns took down Tennessee Saturday night to earn their second SEC victory of the year.  Those two wins coupled with a win against West Virginia and one of the nation's most prolific offenses leaves little excuse for poll voters to leave Auburn off of their ballots this week.

2. South Florida 5-0:  When Matt Grothe went down in the Bulls third game of the year, most people wrote off the Bulls in the Big East.  Little did they realize, the Bulls had just as dynamic of a QB waiting in the wings in BJ Daniels.  The Bulls have two BCS conference wins and three road wins on their resume.

3. Wisconsin 5-0:  The Badgers have shown an uncanny ability to reload year after year and keep winning.  Case in point; Scott Tolzien is the 4th different starting QB in the last four years for the Badgers.  Wisconsin finds themselves at 5-0, with two Big Ten wins plus a victory over Fresno State.

On the Field Heisman Rankings

Excuse me sir, could I interest you in a Heisman?  It seems like nobody wants to win the trophy this year, as contender after contender falls by the wayside.  Last week it was Jacory Harris and Jahvid Best posting poor performances in losses, and this week Case Keenum and the Houston Cougars lost to a UTEP team that was drilled into the ground the week before.  (While Keenum did throw for over 500 yards in the game, one simple fact remains; Heisman winners don't lose to UTEP)

So where does that leave us?  As discussed above, it allows Greg McElroy to continue sneaking up the board, while also opening up spots for some big stat guys.  Going forward, it also allows for Tebow and McCoy to jump right back into the race, with each having a showcase game coming up in the next two weeks (Tebow vs LSU, and McCoy vs Oklahoma).

1. Tony Pike, Cincy:  Seriously, is Pike the only guy that wants the trophy?  Pike continued his sterling season with 270 yards and 2 TDs against Miami (OH).  His next game should be his national coming out party; a nationally televised Thursday nighter on October 15th pitting his 5-0 Bearcats against BJ Daniels and the 5-0 USF Bulls.

2. Greg McElroy, Alabama:  Another game, another win, another two TDs for McElroy.  Next week will provide him with his first big test since the opener against Virginia Tech, as he and the Tide travel to Oxford to play Ole Miss.

3. Jimmy Clausen, Notre Dame:  At some point Clausen and his video game numbers are too hard to ignore on a 4-1 team, averaging over 300 yards and two TDs per game.  You do have to worry however, about the fact that Notre Dame has had to pull out dramatics each of the past three weeks to win by one score against three teams with a combined record of 5-10.  With USC and Boston College coming up next, Clausen's stay on the Heisman list could be a short one.

4. Toby Gerhart, Stanford:  Gerhart led the Cardinal to a big win this week over previously undefeated UCLA with 158 total yards and three TDs.  Gerhart now leads the nation with 650 rushing yards to go along with eight TDs.

Type your summary here

Bookmark WTB!
Press [Ctrl + D]

College Football Blotter Report: Preseason-itis Attacks

Chaos abounded this week, as 6 of the 23 ranked teams that played falling prey to the upset bug.  Or the flu bug perhaps.  Or maybe even more accurately, they fell victim to the #1 cause of early season upsets; Preseason-itis.

To understand what Preseason-itis is, you must first comprehend what an upset is.  On its most basic level in college football, an upset is when a game occurs wherein a ranked team loses to either a lower ranked team or an unranked team.  Well, duh.  You see, I have to elucidate this point because otherwise some people may not comprehend why a game like Ole' Miss losing to South Carolina was a huge upset.  The #4 team in the country losing to an unranked team that had already lost once this season?  Huge upset, right?

Nope.

Two pesky things get in the way of calling the Ole' Miss loss an upset; facts and logic.  These two teams played last year, returned all of the same core players (minus Ole' Miss losing two first round NFL draft picks), and the result was exactly the same as it was last year; a one score South Carolina victory.  So if this same Ole' Miss team lost to this same South Carolina team, why was there such a huge disparity in their rankings?

Preseason-itis.

My number one pet peeve in college football is early season polls.  With the presence of these polls, voters will fall victim to one of three basic human instincts in their voting, which completely skew having an accurate poll early in the season:

1. The Desire to be Right:  Filling out a ballot is a significant investment of time and reputation for a voter.  So when someone goes out and puts a team like Florida #1 on their ballot in the preseason, naturally they will want to keep them there until they lose.  Even if after 4 weeks it is obvious to everyone in the country that this is not the same Florida team as last year, and that Alabama is going to steamroll them by four TDs in the SEC Championship Game.  (Purely hypothetical of course)  This is the same kind of thinking that is occurring right now to fantasy football owners; I am certain that there are those of you out there that are holding on to LT right now, even though every logical bone in your body is telling you he is not going to do anything this year, because dammit, you spent a 3rd round pick on him and you don't want to look like an idiot.

The symptom that arises from this aspect of Preseason-itis, is the gradual creep of unworthy teams up the polls, sometimes to absurd heights.  This year has seen three such instances already.  Ole' Miss had ZERO reason for being ranked #4 in the country, Penn State had no business being #5, and LSU has no business being #7, much less getting moved up one or two spots this week because the two aforementioned impostors were exposed ahead of them this week.  All three of these teams were able to attain these heights though, because for voters to drop them while they were winning would be to admit the one thing nobody likes to admit; that they were wrong.

2. Pack Mentality:  There is a certain magic to poll voting in college football.  Somehow the AP Poll, the Coaches Poll, the Harris Poll, and heck, even the "Blogger Poll" on CBS Sportsline, look stunningly alike.  Why is that?  Did all of these diverse groups of people make the same mistake of putting faith in Ole Miss?  In Oklahoma State?  In Penn State?  In some ways yes, put in one big way, no.  They made a different mistake; they wanted to be like everyone else.  So they look at the other polls from the week before and they slot winners up (even if they looked bad) and slot winners down (even if they looked good), because that is what the group-think decrees.  The reason for this is because going out on a limb is scary, and people tend to point and laugh when you do.  For example, Doug Lesmerises was killed in the media this week because he casts a daring, reactive ballot in the AP poll.  He committed such acts of blasphemy as ranking Florida #5 (gasp!) and ranking USC as #25 (the horror!).    Funny thing is though...want to know two of the teams Doug had ranked lower than almost anyone?  Penn State and Ole' Miss, who coincidentally both got "upset" this week.  Mr. Lesmerises isn't looking so dumb now, is he?

3. Voting for the Story:  Ah, now we are on to the big elephant in the room.  Everyone sees it.  Everyone knows it.  Nobody wants to admit they are going it though.  Why is Boise State ranked 8th in the country?  Why was a garbage Notre Dame team ranked 18th earlier this year?  Why was USC ranked 3rd earlier this year, after losing their starting QB, top 2 two WRs, and almost their entire linebacking corps from last year?  Simply put, voters vote for the story many times, not for the teams.  Non-BCS team making noise?  That's a story.  Perennial  power rising in the rankings coming off a bad year (Notre Dame, Michigan)?  That's a story.

Now here is a story nobody is talking about; for all intents and purposes, as a result of Preseason-itis, Boise State has already clinched a BCS berth.  What?  Boise is already solidly within the top 12, and does not have a single scary opponent left on their schedule.  So on the strength of beating one ranked team (at home mind you), Boise is going to go to a BCS Bowl.  The only worse case of this phenomenon was in 2007, when Hawaii went to a BCS bowl in a year when their best non-conference win was against a 4-9 PAC-10 team.  Yes, that actually happened.

You see, voting on Boise this year has exhibited all three symptoms of Preseason-itis.  They were ranked 14th going into the season, so they have moved up because people want to be right.  They are staying in the top ten because of the pack mentality.  And they are most clearly a result of voting for the story (you don't think voters aren't thinking of that Orange Bowl upset every-time they vote for Boise?), because their ranking falls victim to one huge logical flaw; they should be ranked behind TCU.  Why?  Well, TCU was ranked higher than Boise at the end of last year, and in fact BEAT Boise just 9 months ago in a bowl game.  Yet somehow both teams are undefeated, but Boise is ranked 7 spots higher.  Why?  They are a better story than a TCU team that the country is not familiar with, that's why.  The real problem is that if TCU does go undefeated, they would have a much stronger resume than Boise (@UVA, @Clemson, @BYU, and vs. Utah), but would fail to get a BCS bid due to poor voting habits.  And that would be a true shame.

Unranked Victims of Preseason-itis:

To stay on the theme, here are four teams that should be ranked, but are being held out of the polls:

1. Iowa:  While Iowa will probably be ranked by the end of the day due to their upset of Penn State, they should have already been ranked, and ranked highly.  Why?  Take a look at their schedule.  They are 4-0, with wins over Penn State, Iowa State, and Arizona.  Ok, who cares about Iowa State and Arizona?  Voters should; the four teams that Iowa has beat this season are a combined 12-0 this year against teams not named Iowa.  Now there is some food for thought.

2. Auburn:  Auburn is 4-0, with a trip to Tennessee this week that should be another easy victory.  So far this season they have defeated two BCS teams (Miss. State and West Va.), and have shown an explosive offense that has gone for totals of 37, 41, 49, and 54 points so far this season.  You are telling me this team isn't better than Nebraska or UNC?

3. Wisconsin:  Wisconsin always plays ugly football.  They play defense, and grind it out on the ground on offense.  As a result, voters never think of them as a sexy pick.  The Badgers stand at 4-0 this year, playing their typical brand of un-sexy football while beating Michigan State and Fresno State already this year.

4. South Carolina:  The other USC's only sin this season has been a 4 point loss on the road to a pretty good Georgia team.  Other than that, they have beat a better than you think NC State team on the road, as well as "upset" #4 Ole' Miss.  How are they not ranked?

On the Field Heisman Rankings:

Oh how the mighty have fallen.  A big shakeup in the rankings this week, as Jacory Harris and Jahvid Best both had disastrous days in upset losses to fall out of the rankings.  The real story in the Heisman race however, is that there is no story.  Nobody seems to want the darn thing this year.  Colt McCoy keeps throwing Interceptions.  Tim Tebow has not had a single Heisman worthy game.  Sam Bradford has missed to much time already to even be considered.  So who is left?  Tony Pike actually, the only man in the country that has looked like a Heisman winner every week thus far:

1. Tony Pike, Cincy:  Pike's resume gets stronger and stronger every week.  Adding to his 300+ yard, 3 TD performances over Rutgers and Oregon State earlier this season, Pike put in another outstanding performance against Fresno State.  Pike passed for 300 yards and 3 TDs and added another 22 yards on the ground.

2. Case Keenum, Houston:  Things didn't look too good for Case, down 28-23 to Texas Tech in the 4th quarter last night.  Keenum didn't crack under pressure though, leading the Cougars on a game winning drive late in the 4th to pull ahead 29-28 against the Red Raiders.  Keenum put up his typical video game numbers (457 total yards, 2 total TDs) and now has two big time performances against Big 12 teams on his resume.

3. Ryan Williams, Virginia Tech:  You might be shocked to see Williams here, but the numbers don't lie; in three games against ranked opponents so far this year he has put up 412 total yards and 5 TDs.  Pretty good for a Freshman that only got the job due to an injury to the incumbent.

4. Greg McElroy, Alabama:  McElroy is ranked 3rd in the country in QB rating (first amongst BCS QBs) and has looked deadly for what I believe is the best team in the country.  With wins against Virginia Tech and Arkansas on his resume, he is looking as good as any QB in the country.

Bookmark WTB!

Press [Ctrl + D]

College Football Blotter Report: Reveal Week

So this was Revenge Week eh?  You know, the week where Urban Meyer was supposed to pound Lane Kiffin, Pete Carroll was supposed to trash Steve Sarkisian, and Texas was supposed to show Texas Tech the pain of missing out on a national title shot last year.  That was this week right?

Whoops.

Revenge Week (you have to love ESPN for those monikers right?) evidently didn't get the invitation to the party, and at the last second another guest arrived; Reveal Week.  You see, the casual fan was stunned by this week's developments.  USC losing to a Washington team that was 0-11 last year?  BYU getting thrashed by a Florida State squad that looked horrible against a I-AA school last week (I will never use FC$ by the way)? Florida having a much tighter game than expected?  All shockers.  The truth though, is that all of these results merely revealed truths that were already evident to people willing to look at the play on the field this season rather than the names on the jerseys (I'm looking at you poll voters).

First off, USC is not an elite team; not even close.  After watching the USC-OSU game last week I texted a friend of mine that is a huge OSU fan to let him know what I got out of watching the game; neither team has any business being in a BCS bowl.  This year's incarnation of USC is not a good offensive team.  Period.  They lost two of their best WRs from last year (one to injury) along with a QB that was a top 10 draft pick, and replaced that trio with a true freshman at QB and two WRs that combined for six catches last year.  Why exactly were they expected to be a great offensive team this year?  Oh yeah, I forgot, this is USC, and they are always good.  Silly me.

And lest I forget, Matt Barkley is the next Joe Montana.  I mean, he played so great in that OSU game, and led them to victory on a last second drive!

Except...that never happened.

You see, a ruse was perpetrated on the American public last week.  The sports media collectively took a dead cat and tried to sell us a mink coat.  The ruse:  Matt Barkley had a great game, showed great poise, and was the hero of the comeback drive against OSU.  The reality: Barkley had a bad game, and Joe McKnight was the hero of the winning drive.  Seriously, did anyone watch that game?  Just as a refresher, here are Barkley's stats:

15-31, 195 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INT

Just look at those for a second, and I think you'll see what I see.  Under 50% passing?  Check.  Under 200 yards?  Check.  Negative TD/INT ratio?  Check.  Color me confused, but I do not understand how this performance was being billed as a breakout performance for Barkley.  The numbers don't lie; he played poorly.  In the wake of USC's loss to Washington, almost every story on the game has noted that the 13 points and 110 passing yards are historic lows for the Trojans.  Not a single story noted that those numbers were only slightly worse than last week's performance of 18 points and 195 passing yards.  What that tells me (sorry Trojan fans) is that USC's passing offense is not going to get much better once Barkley returns.  USC has five tough games left on their schedule (@Cal, @Notre Dame, Oregon State, @Oregon, UCLA), and it would be no surprise if they lost more than one of them.

Now that we have seen why USC losing should not have been totally unexpected, why exactly did Florida have so much trouble with Tennessee? Same song, second verse my friends.  Just as voters seemed to ignore that USC lost Mark Sanchez and Patrick Turner and had little to replace them, they have also ignored the fact that Florida lost play-makers.  In Percy Harvin and Louis Murphy, the Gators lost their top two receivers from a year ago, along with their top rusher not named Tebow.  And the guy that was supposed to step in and be Percy Harvin 2.0, Andre Debose?  Season ending surgery without playing a down.  Still curious about why the Gators didn't throw 50 on the Vols?  Short answer; they couldn't.  This Gators team is all Tebow, all the time.  Do you think SEC teams are really scared of Riley Cooper and David Nelson?  Nah, me either.

While Florida should easily win the SEC East, they won't escape a schedule with LSU, Georgia, Arkansas, South Carolina, and Florida State without a loss, and I doubt they have the firepower to beat Alabama in an SEC title game match-up.  This Florida team looks a lot more like the 9-4 team of two years ago than the 13-1 squad of last year.  At some point the voters will recognize that fact.

What You Weren't Watching:

I must confess, I have a guilty pleasure when it comes to college football.  I love watching the bottom of the Top 25 throughout the season.  The overachievers.  The underachievers.  The comeback kids.  Most years, teams 21-25 are exponentially more entertaining than teams 1-5.  And this week featured one of my favorite types of games; a Top 25 play-in game.  Didn't see it on the schedule?  Oh, it was there.  Auburn-West Virgina.  Two BCS conference teams in similar states of transition that found themselves at 2-0, coming off disappointing seasons and featuring question marks at key positions.  For WVU; can Jarrett Brown be the next Pat White?  For Auburn; can Gus Malzahn work his wizardy as offensive coordinator on an offense that was putrid last year?  The winner would find themselves at 3-0, and most likely comfortably nestled into the 24th or 25th spot in the polls, after Nebraska, Utah, Georgia Tech, and Oregon State lost earlier in the day.

(Side-note: Why are people pretending Mizzou is a ranked team?  They lost the two best players off a 10-4 team that lost to almost every good team they played, and have a three game stretch coming up of Nebraska-Oklahoma State-Texas.  They are going 0-3 in those games, take it to the bank.)

Auburn prevailed in a shootout 41-30, a third straight impressive offensive performance for the Mighty Malzahns of Auburn Land.  With a horrible Ball State team coming to town next week followed by a trip to offensively crippled Tennessee  (do you think Jonathan Crompton is going to lead the Vols to 30-40 points in a single SEC game this season?), the Tigers are poised to be 5-0 heading into mid-October.  Pretty good for a team that went 5-7 last year.

On the Field Heisman Rankings:

So what exactly do I mean by "on the field"?  Simply put, these rankings don't factor in last year, two years ago, who you play for, or what people expected before the season.  The obvious difference between these rankings and most out right now, is that you are going to see a distinct lack of Tebow and McCoy.  Both QBs had their first marquee chances of the season this week, and both disappointed.  Tebow had under 200 total yards against Tennessee with no passing TDs and an interception.  McCoy only had 210 total yards while also posting a negative TD/INT ratio against Texas Tech.  You won't see either of these guys in my rankings until they earn it on the field.  Now, on to the rankings:

1. Jacory Harris, Miami (Fl.):  This one is a no brainer.  Two nationally televised games against ranked conference opponents.  Two upset wins.  Two 3 TD games by the precocious sophomore Harris.  And guess what?  Harris has his third straight chance this week, with another national TV shot against a ranked conference opponent in Virginia Tech.

2. Jahvid Best, Cal: In each of his first three games this year, Best has gone for 140+ yards from scrimmage and multiple TDs, highlighted by his scoring of all 5 TDs against Minnesota this weekend.  Three straight big games, including two non-conference wins against BCS conference opponents, means Best is having the er...best start by any running back in the country.

3. Tony Pike, Cincy: While nobody has been watching, Pike has orchestrated two big road wins for the Bearcats, trashing Big East favorite Rutgers in Week 1 and topping a ranked Oregon State team this weekend, going for 330+ yards and 3 TDs in both contests.  The only QB with a more impressive set of victories is Harris, and that is why he is #1.

4.  Case Keenum, Houston:  The rest of the Heisman conversation belongs to the stat kings, and Keenum has the advantage of being the only big number passer with a marquee victory this season, going for 366 yards and 4 total TDs in upsetting Oklahoma State last week.

Bookmark WTB!

Press [Ctrl + D]

Darren McFadden Is A Clown

Remember those crazy qoutes about Darren McFadden that came out during the SEC Media Days in July? Just in case you don't, here is a little refresher:

"Last Halloween, the most recognizable 19-year-old in the state went to his classes in complete disguise. Wearing a clown suit, complete with rainbow wig, oversized glasses, a fake cigar, striped shirt, enormous yellow pants and wide suspenders, McFadden could have struck a Heisman pose and still remained anonymous."

Man, that sounds hysterical. Too bad no pictures ever turned up of tha...wait, you found what?

That's right, here is Darren McFadden in all his be-clowned glory. Enjoy. (Click for a larger version)






You Might Also Like:
Yao' Wedding Invitations
OJ Simpson's Strange Week
Cleveland Cavaliers Rapper Lookalikes


Bookmark WTB!
Press [Ctrl + D]

NFL Rookie (Cheerleader) Preview

Now that the Summer is coming to a close, thoughts of football are starting to pop up again in the collective mind of the American sports fan. Training camps. New coaches. Rookies. Hopes and expectations. And soon...

Cheerleaders.

As familiar as most fans are with the new crop of rookies entering the NFL, there seems to be a general lack of awareness concerning the new crop of sideline ladies entering the league this year. Here at WTB, we feel that it is just as important to be familiar with Lauren Gardner as it is to be familiar with JaMarcus Russell. Thankfully, this is a problem that can be easily rectified. Here is a look at this year's top rookies:


Lauren Gardner, Denver Broncos:
If there is a Rookie of the Year favorite, my vote would no doubt go to Lauren from the Broncos. Maybe I just have a thing for redheads, but Lauren is by far the best looking new cheerleader in my opinion. In case you wanted to know a little more about Lauren, she recently won the title of "2007 Face of Champ Car" which evidently involved her posing in a bikni. According to the Champ Car website Lauren is "21 years old, and a full time student. She would like to get into broadcasting."




Erica, Washington Redskins:
I'm not going to lie; I'm a Redskins fan. My bias aside however, I don't think there is much denying that Erica is one extremely attractive cheerleader. According to her bio on the Redskins' website, Erica is 26 years old and works as a public health analyst. Prior to joining the Redskins Erica danced in college at USC with the USC Flygirls.


Lisa, Buffalo Bills:
Buffalo can be an extremely cold place during football season. It's a good thing then that Bills fans will have the Jills to keep the heat up on the sidelines this year. Chief among the Jills' new additions is Lisa, whose favorite foods are "Chicken fingers and cotton candy ice cream". Just in case you were wondering.


Kristie, Carolina Panthers:
The Panthers' cheerleaders don't exactly have the most sterling repuation around the NFL. So what would be the best way to go about repairing that image? Signing up women like Kristie seems like a good place to start. Kristie lists among her greatest achievements "Graduating with bachelor's degree in radiologic science, dean's list member at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill". Brains and beauty? Sounds like David Carr will have some good conversation on the sidelines this year.

Kindle, Tennessee Titans:
Take a look at Kindle's picture real quick. Given the fact that her name also happens to be Kindle, does it really suprise you that her bio on the Titans website contains 40 exclamation points? I don't really care actually; I'd be pretty excited too if I was around a beautiful Southern blonde like Kindle.

Alaina, Philadelphia Eagles:
We move from blonde to brunette with Alaina of the Eagles, who says that her favorite ice cream is Birthday Cake Remix from Cold Stone Creamery. Alaina also went to Rutgers along with LJ Smith of the Eagles, and cheered him while he played football for the Scarlet Knights.


The Entire Houston Texans Rookie Squad:
If you only click one link today, you should do yourself a favor and take a look around the website of the Houston Texans cheerleaders. I have no idea how the Texans were able to bring in such an insanely gorgeous crop of new cheerleaders, but somehow they were able to bring in gorgeous women of all types. If there was a team award for rookies, the Texans would win in a walk. Too bad Mario Williams didn't work out as well for them last year...

You Might Also Like:Hot Fan Showdown: Yanks vs. Sox
Babes In Jerseys
An Interview With The Snorg Girl
Where Are They Now? Sports Movie Tomboys

Bookmark WTB!
Press [Ctrl + D]

Football Video Game Update

NFL Tour...because Madden, Street, Arena, and Head Coach just aren't enough: It seems that EA Sports is adding yet another title to its stable of NFL video games, the newest one being something called "NFL Tour". According to EA's press release (via Kotaku) the arcade style game will suck give gamers a new experience not offered by their current titles:

Gamers will be able to embark on a fictional NFL road show. With real NFL players as teammates, players will travel across the country to play against each of the NFL teams in newly designed stadiums. As players defeat each of the NFL squads, they come one step closer to winning a NFL contract.

So...essentially this is going to be the red-headed stepchild of NFL Street and Blitz? Is that what I'm reading? Maybe it is just me, but I am not too terribly interested in playing a football game that doesn't have a season mode. The real question with this release though, is whether or not this game contributes anything useful to the football video game universe. My money is on no, since it just sounds like a gimmicky version of NFL Street. Too bad the development of this game will likely take some of the programmers away from Roster Update Madden development.

It's coming....: NCAA 08 is set for release in less than a week, and the first question that will have to be answered is whether or not two of the main gameplay problems of recent years have been fixed. Will defensive ends be able to contain...anything? Will wide receivers continue to drop passes at a ridiculous rate? EA has said that both issues have been resolved, but I'll wait and see before I buy that line. The other big question for players (especially online ones) is which teams will be overpowered. The only real guess anyone can make is that Darren McFadden and Arkansas will be nasty, considering the fact that it has already been announced that McFadden will be the only player in the game with a 100 overall rating. My dark horse pick though is West Virginia. Not because of Steve Slaton and Pat White though, but rather because if EA gives incoming freshman Noel Devine an accurate speed rating the Mountaineers will be unstoppable on offense.

If a video game dies and nobody is there to play it...: Releasing on the same day as NCAA will be 2K Sports All-Pro Football 2K8. The plight of the 2K football series is a rather sad one, as it is the technically superior series to Madden yet EA's exclusive license with the NFL has relagated the 2K series to going with the gimmick of making a game featuring solely retired legends. As much as I have enjoyed the 2K games in the past, I just can't see myself putting down $60 for a game just to play as Jerry Rice and John Elway when I can just crank up the 'ole Tecmo Bowl instead. While the game itself may not do well, I do like the commercials for the game.

360 Or PS3? Madden Choice Made Easier

With the release of EA Sports' NCAA 08 and Madden 08 fast approaching I have been trying to decide which next gen system to which I should commit my football allegiance. After the Xbox 360 came out a few years back I switched from the PS2, primarily because the graphics were just so much better. Now that the PS3 is out though, I was back to deciding which controller I liked better. Or so I thought that was the only difference. It seems that there is going to be another difference between the 360 and PS3 versions of Madden and NCAA, one that essentially makes my choice for me. From Kotaku:

The PS3, it's a ferocious beast. Which means it's not easily tamed. Not even if you've got a pine chair and your trustiest whip. This ferociousness may be behind EA's and 2K's decision to nueter the PS3 versions of Madden 08, NCAA 08 and APF2K8, which will all be running at 30 frames-per-second. On 360, they'll hum along at 60 fps.

So there you have it; if you go with the PS3 you are going to have to play a graphically gimped version of the football games. Oi. This terribly saddens me mainly because I just wanted something to play on my most expensive paper weight.

Also, hit up the comments if you have an opinion on which is better for football games, the Xbox or PS control scheme. I haven't played one on a PS in quite a bit, so I am just curious to see if their is a consensus either way.

Vol Busted For Crack

During the past three years Phillp Fulmer has seen over a dozen of his Tennessee Vols players get in trouble with the law. (As you can see, here, here, and here) The charges in those cases have ranged from disorderly conduct to aggravated assault, but the latest Vol transgression may well take the cake; walk on wide receiver Justin Jackson has been kicked off the team after being arrested for crack:

Tennessee walk-on football player Justin Jackson was dismissed from the team Thursday by Coach Phillip Fulmer after being arrested and charged Wednesday night with the alleged sale or possession of crack cocaine.

Jackson, who played at West High in Knoxville, transferred to UT from Maryville College. He was a non-recruited walk-on receiver for the upcoming season. The arrest occurred at a East Knoxville housing project.

All I can say is that Phillip Fulmer is really lucky that Myles Brand is in charge of the NCAA and not Roger Goodell.

Commonwealth Confusion

Labor Day weekend is a time when people can enjoy parades, picnics, baseball, and time with their families. For the past five years it was also a time when people could enjoy watching Louisville play Kentucky on ESPN in the first game of the season for both teams. According to the Courier-Journal in Louisville that will not be the case this year. The two teams moved their game back two weeks to September 15th and the switch has resulted in the game being without a national broadcast home. Even though ESPN, ESPN2, and even ESPNU are booked there is still hope for a national broadcast: ESPN Classic has expressed interest in airing the game. This development brings to mind two interesting points. First, ESPN Classic is a farce. How can it air live games? Wasn't the whole point of the channel to air games that were "classics"? Now all the station seems to air are World Series of Poker reruns and trick shot competitions. The second point though, is the sad part of this entire dilemma. The game actually does have the potential to be a classic for once. In a series where Louisville has won seven of the past eight games, many of them being blowouts, Kentucky actually stands a good chance this year. Coming off their first bowl season in 22 years and boasting a Heisman candidate in QB Andre Woodson Kentucky has their best team in decades. Too bad the country may not get to see them in their biggest showcase of the season.

Mike Vick: Follow The Money

Be forewarned: This is going to be a lot of speculation, but I think it points to something fairly obvious.

The big news today has been the Outside The Lines report on ESPN featuring an interview with a dogfighting insider who claims that Mike Vick is a "heavyweight" in the dogfighting scene. The two major claims made by the informant are that 1.) He personally fought against a Mike Vick trained pitbull in 2000 and 2.) He had personally seen Mike Vick at a dog fight as recently as last year.

There is something else that has stuck out in the article to me. Now, this speculation factors in that the informant is entirely truthful, so take that as you will. So here are a few excerpts from the article, my emphasis added: See if you know where I am headed:

"Our confidential source said he's been involved in dog fighting for more than 30 years, He has trained and fought -- by his estimation -- about 2,000 pit bulls and was poised to tell "Outside the Lines" about the time in 2000 when his dog squared off against a dog owned by someone he referred to as one of the "heavyweights" of the dog fighting world: Atlanta Falcons quarterback Mike Vick."

"Then he started, you know, waving money," the source said. "He was betting with everybody … He said he got $5,000. He said he's betting on his animal."

"American pit bull terriers account for 99 percent of the species involved in dog fighting, and a pit bull puppy can cost as much as $5,000. An average dog fight carries a $10,000 purse."

Now, if that does not connect the dots for you as to where I am headed I understand: I didn't see it at first either. Things will become a lot more clearer if you go to Vick's player card at ESPN, where you will see...

"Drafted: Year: 2001 Round:1 Pick:1, Falcons"

You see now? If the informant is to be believed, Vick was fighting pit bulls while still in college. Pit bulls that would have 1.) been years in breeding and training and 2.) according to the report would have cost thousands of dollars to buy. And on top of that, Vick is accused not only of having a dog in this 2000 fight, but also at least $5,000 in betting money to throw around. As a recent college grad let me state the obvious: college juniors do not have 5 large to drop on a puppy, nor do they have another 5 large to bet on said puppy when it grows up. So what am I saying? Well, I think that if people are so game to go after Reggie Bush and his family to investigate whether they were accepting funds while Bush was in college, maybe they should also examine whether or not Vick was getting similar benefits. To be honest, if the allegations made in the article are true, Frank Beamer and company should be held responsible for a lack of administrative control if one of their players was getting thousands of dollars in benefits and committing felonies in his spare time.

The Great Billboard Submission

If you haven't already seen it, The Wizard of Odds is running a college football billboard contest. It is some pretty funny stuff. Anyway, I felt a bit inspired and whipped up a quick submission. I'm not sure if it will be used over at Wizard of Odds, but here it is for your enjoyment, along with a close up of one of the more interesting aspects:





And if you are utterly confused, go here.

College Football Land Rejoices!

Last year the NCAA implemented a new series of rules aimed at lowering times of games. Ostensibly this was done to help out the networks televising the games, as the 14 minutes the rules shaved off of the average game (from 3:21 to 3:07) last year was really useful so that...um...CBS could show 14 more commercials per broadcast? So the networks could fit one more episode of Malcom in the Middle into their early evening syndication lineups? To refresh your memory, the two major rule changes last year were that 1. The clock started when the kicking team kicked the ball (In the past the clock started when the receiving team touched the ball) and 2. On a change of possession the clock started when the official marked the ball (In the past the clock started on the snap). These rules changes did lower the times of games (as well as scoring, down five points a game last year), but they also led to a couple of unforeseen consequences. The change of possession rule made it even harder for a trailing team to get back in the game, as an extra 5-10 seconds lost when there are only 40 or so left in a game can crush a rally. (This also spawned one of my favorite Viewer Heckling moments in all of sports: Every time I watched a game last year I would look forward to seeing how many seconds a QB would waste after the official had started the clock. It was one of those rare moments in watching sports where you could honestly say without question "I could do better than that!" It was also super entertaining to see the deer in the headlights look on a QB when he realized the clock was running. Priceless.) The kickoff rules change was a terrible idea that spawned my favorite moment of all of last football season, when Bret Bielma of Wisconsin intentionally ran his kickoff team offsides near the end of the first half. Joe Pa was then left with two choices, take the ball at the 10 on the penalty, or let Wisconsin continue to use the ploy to run out the clock. Joe Pa chose the latter, and Bret Bielma became my Big 10 coach.

So in light of the obvious stupidity of the new rules the NCAA is poised to overturn them. Yay! say college football fans. Yay! say deer in the headlights QBs. Yay! says everyon..what? Wait. What is that you say? There are more new rules coming in with the repeals of last year's mistakes? Oi. Here is a look at the new rules proposed to come into effect next season:

-The play clock would be shortened from 25 to 15 seconds after a timeout
-Timeouts would be reduced from 65 to 30 seconds
-Instant replay reviews would be limited to two minutes
-Kickoffs would be moved back five yards, from the 30 instead of the 35

Now, at first, I really wanted to hate these new rules. I really did. I consider myself a bit of a traditionalist, and any change to the game sets off little alarms in my head. After thinking about the changes though, they just made too much sense for me to hate them. The first rule is rather benign, and I think it is a good one if only because it gives our friend deer in the headlights QB an opportunity to take a dumb delay of game penalty. The second rule also seems fairly simple, and considering that very few timeouts are actually taken for in depth skull sessions as opposed to clock management, I don't think it will detract anything from the game. The replay rule also seems like a fairly simple and easy one, as I know personally I saw way too many 5+ minute deliberations under the hood by college refs last season. Ah, but now onto the most tantalizing of the rule changes, kicking off from five yards further back. The thinking behind this rule is that more returns = more time run off the clock. That is a fair enough assumption, if saving time is your end goal. This rule has the potential however, to do exactly the opposite of what the two rule changes last year did: make the game more exciting and raise scoring. Yay! says everyone. I know that I saw a lot of kicks last year that were touchbacks, but certainly not by five yards. With the added number of returns caused by the rule we are going to see three things; 1. Better field position for the returning team, which inevitably over the course of a game will lead to more scoring opportunities. 2. More return TDs, as it is just common sense that more kicks will be returned all the way when the total number of returns rises and the distance required to score decreases. 3. More big hits on kick coverage, as the more kicks returned means the more licks dished out. Now this is the way to decrease the broadcast time of a game, while not taking anything away from the product on the field. Where were these guys last year when the rules committee was meeting?