
First off, I would like you to ask yourself a question: When was the last time I watched a boxing match?
For most, the answer to that question is not going to be at any point in the recent past. So why is that? It can't be because of pay-per-view costs, as the standard $50 price point has not stopped the WWE or the UFC from consistently selling their big events. And to be honest, the answer is not that the quality of the sport has declined: if you are not a boxing fan, or even just a very casual one, do yourself a favor and look around the internet for the Manny Pacquiao-Juan Manuel Marquez fight, and then tell me that the quality of the sport is falling off. (Here is the fight) The modern boxing landscape has a number of all-time great fighters still going, including Pacquiao, Floyd Mayweather Jr., and Oscar De La Hoya, as well as a number of great young fighters coming into their own such as Jermain Taylor, Winky Wright, Ricky Hatton, and Chris John. So if the money is not too much, and the fighting is still good...why doesn't anyone care anymore? Why is boxing at risk of being marginalized at the hands or professional wrestling and mixed martial arts?
Second question: Name three boxers from the past.
For the non-boxing fans and even the casual boxing fans, your answer to that question probably included 1-3 of the following boxers: Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, Mike Tyson, Evander Holyfield, Joe Frazier, George Foreman, and Lennox Lewis. Notice a pattern there? The health of boxing in the modern era has been intrinsically related to the fighters in the heavyweight division. Chalk this up to the heightened spectacle of larger combatants, the potential for more electric knockouts, or a public preference for power over finnesse. The point is, for whatever reason, even if the lower divisions are alive and well, boxing will suffer in the eyes of the general sports fan if the heavyweight division is in shambles.
Third question: Name the current heavyweight champion(s).
The answer to this question reveals the core problem that boxing is having at present. The four heavyweight champions are Sultan Ibragimov, Wladimir Klitschko, Oleg Maskaev, and Ruslan Chageav. Now, there are two problems with that list, the first being the fact that there are four fighters on it instead of one or two. Ever since Lennox Lewis left the hevyweight title has been fragmented. The sad reason for this is that fighters today would rather be "a" champion rather than "the" champion. What I mean by that is that boxers, such as Chris Byrd in the recent past, have been content to grab their quarter of the heavyweight title and then hold on for dear life, fighting punching bags and avoiding anything resembling a unification bout. Why? Simple: each fight they keep the title is another fight they can promote themselves as "heavyweight champion of the world...", a phrase which even in today's broken landscape still holds a large degree of marketing cache. Beyond the lack of unification there is also the fact that other than perhaps Wladimir Klitschko, and he only truly through his brother, the American public does not know or care to know any of the current champions. It doesn't help matters that many of them are not only not from the US, but are also not willing to fight in the US at all
Fourth question: Is there any way to stop the decline?
Of course there is a way to fix this mess. The answer, as the past would show, rests in individual personalities. And there are personalities out there in the heavyweight division that could save the sport. So who are these men? Well, since you asked...


